Integral evaluation instrument of development in rural communities: Construct validation and reliability
Problemas del Desarrollo, ISSN: 2007-8951, Vol: 52, Issue: 207, Page: 57-77
2021
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article studies the construct validity and reliability of the instrument "analytical rubric for the comprehensive diagnosis of development levels in rural communities". The instrument was applied to 351 inhabitants of rural communities, using exploratory factorial analysis. Findings show that the factorial model consisted of four dimensions: i) organizational, economic-environmental, and educational access conditions; ii) infrastructure; iii) governance; and iv) social and cultural conditions, which account for over 58% of the differences. Regarding reliability, an optimal value was obtained globally (Cronbach's alpha: 0.800) and was also significant across all dimensions. The article concludes that the instrument accurately measures the objective construct, demonstrating its usefulness in using local populations' perceptions to provide valid and reliable assessments of development levels in rural communities.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85117469448&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2021.207.69760; https://probdes.iiec.unam.mx/index.php/pde/article/view/69760; https://probdes.iiec.unam.mx/index.php/pde/article/download/69760/62099; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0301-70362021000400057&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0301-70362021000400057&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0301-70362021000400057; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0301-70362021000400057; https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2021.207.69760
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know