Artificial intelligence and neurorights. Challenges and perspectives
Cuestiones Constitucionales, ISSN: 2448-4881, Vol: 46, Issue: 46, Page: 93-119
2022
- 1Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article explores the relationships between artificial intelligence (AI) and law, as well as the challenges of its regulation; also analyzes the role of AI in social transformation, as well as the implications it has for the law. The interaction of people with smart devices poses challenges from a legal perspective: the protection of human identity and neural integrity. The advances that machine learning and deep learning represent, as well as the emergence of neuroscience and neurotechnology, have generated the irruption of a new legal category: neurorights, which must be examined and distinguished from traditional rights from a constitutional perspective, in order to guarantee its due regulation in the face of innovative developments in AI.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143910834&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2022.46.17049; https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/17049; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-91932022000100093&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1405-91932022000100093&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-91932022000100093; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1405-91932022000100093; https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2022.46.17049
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know