Complemento de VS.NET para la definición óptima de pruebas de software de caja negra mediante arreglos de cobertura
Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, ISSN: 1692-3324, Vol: 17, Issue: 33, Page: 121-137
2018
- 232Usage
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Resumen Las pruebas de software pueden llegar a superar el 50 % del costo total de un proyecto de software, motivo por el cual las empresas necesitan una alternativa que permita reducir su costo y el tiempo de su realización. Esta investigación propone el uso de unas estructuras combinatoriales conocidas como arreglos de cubrimiento (CA) y arreglos de cubrimiento mixtos (MCA), que garantizan la detección hasta del 100 % de los errores con una mínima cantidad de pruebas. Con este enfoque, se desarrolló un complemento de Visual Studio.NET para la optimización de las pruebas y se evaluó su uso con estudiantes de último semestre de Ingeniería de Sistemas y de una empresa de software. Los resultados obtenidos son prometedores y motivan al grupo de investigación a divulgar su trabajo en el nivel nacional. El proyecto de investigación fue financiado por la Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones de la Universidad del Cauca.
Bibliographic Details
https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/1646; https://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/1646/2547; http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/rium.v17n33a6; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1692-33242018000200121&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1692-33242018000200121&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1692-33242018000200121; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1692-33242018000200121; https://dx.doi.org/10.22395/rium.v17n33a6
Universidad de Medellin
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know