The effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: A randomized, controlled trial
Diabetes Care, ISSN: 0149-5992, Vol: 36, Issue: 2, Page: 228-236
2013
- 292Citations
- 650Captures
- 17Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations292
- Citation Indexes288
- 288
- CrossRef189
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures650
- Readers650
- 650
- Mentions17
- News Mentions17
- News17
Most Recent News
Wondering how to lose belly fat? Try these 5 types of walking
Looking to make the most of your morning walk? You must try some of the most effective ways of walking to lose belly fat. Are
Article Description
OBJECTIVE-To evaluate the feasibility of free-living walking training in type 2 diabetic patients and to investigate the effects of interval-walking training versus continuous-walking training upon physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control. RESEARCHDESIGN ANDMETHODS- Subjectswithtype2diabetes wererandomized to a control (n = 8), continuous-walking (n = 12), or interval-walking group (n = 12). Training groups were prescribed five sessions per week (60 min/session) and were controlled with an accelerometer and a heart-rate monitor. Continuous walkers performed all training at moderate intensity, whereas interval walkers alternated 3-min repetitions at low and high intensity. Before and after the 4-month intervention, the following variables were measured: VOmax, body composition, and glycemic control (fasting glucose, HbA, oral glucose tolerance test, and continuous glucose monitoring [CGM]). RESULTS-Training adherence was high (89 ± 4%), and training energy expenditure and mean intensity were comparable. VOmax increased 16.1 ± 3.7% in the interval-walking group (P, 0.05),whereas no changes were observedin the continuous-walking or control group. Body mass and adiposity (fat mass and visceral fat) decreased in the interval-walking group only (P < 0.05). Glycemic control (elevated mean CGM glucose levels and increased fasting insulin) worsened in the control group (P < 0.05), whereas mean (P = 0.05) and maximum (P < 0.05) CGM glucose levels decreased in the interval-walking group. The continuous walkers showed no changes in glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS-Free-living walking training is feasible in type 2 diabetic patients. Continuous walking offsets the deterioration in glycemia seen in the control group, and interval walking is superior to energy expenditure-matched continuous walking for improving physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control.© 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873841346&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0658; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23002086; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01234155; https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/36/2/228/38194/The-Effects-of-Free-Living-Interval-Walking; https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0658; https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228; https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.abstract; https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/36/2/228.full.pdf; http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228; http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.abstract; http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/2/228.full.pdf; http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/dc12-0658
American Diabetes Association
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know