PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

A randomized controlled trial on the safety and efficacy of exenatide therapy for the inpatient management of general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes

Diabetes Care, ISSN: 1935-5548, Vol: 42, Issue: 3, Page: 450-456
2019
  • 65
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 151
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    65
  • Captures
    151
  • Mentions
    2
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2

Most Recent News

Exenatide may be an option for hospitalized patients with diabetes

Exenatide may be an option for hospitalized patients with diabetes Mon, 07/01/2019 - 09:34 caldridgeyoung… Mon, 07/01/2019 - 09:28 “Increasing data from several randomized controlled studies indicate that incretin agents such as the DPP-4 [dipeptidyl peptidase-4] inhibitors and GLP-1 [glucagon-like peptide-1] receptor agonists alone or in combination with basal insulin are as effective as basal–bo

Article Description

OBJECTIVE This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial examined the safety and efficacy of exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin in non–critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 150 patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated at home with diet, oral agents, or insulin at a total daily dose <0.5 units/kg, were randomized to exenatide alone (5 mg twice daily), exenatide plus basal insulin, or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. The primary end point was difference in mean daily BG concentration among groups. RESULTS Mean daily BG was similar between patients treated with exenatide plus basal and a basal-bolus regimen (154 ± 39 vs. 166 ± 40 mg/dL, P = 0.31), and exenatide plus basal resulted in lower daily BG than did exenatide alone (177 ± 41 mg/dL, P = 0.02). Exenatide plus basal resulted in a higher proportion of BG levels in target range between 70 and 180 mg/dL compared with exenatide and basal-bolus (78% vs. 62% vs. 63%, respectively, P = 0.023). More patients in the exenatide and exenatide plus basal groups experienced nausea or vomiting than in the basal-bolus group (10% vs. 11% vs. 2%, P = 0.17), with three patients (6%) discontinued exenatide owing to adverse events. There were no differences in hypoglycemia <54 mg/dL (2% vs. 0% vs. 4%, P = 0.77) or length of stay (5 vs. 4 vs. 4 days, P = 0.23) among basal plus exenatide, exenatide, and basal-bolus groups. CONCLUSIONS The results of this pilot study indicate that exenatide alone or in combination with basal insulin is safe and effective for the management of hospitalized general medical and surgical patients with T2D.

Bibliographic Details

Fayfman, Maya; Galindo, Rodolfo J; Rubin, Daniel J; Mize, Dara L; Anzola, Isabel; Urrutia, Maria A; Ramos, Clementina; Pasquel, Francisco J; Haw, J Sonya; Vellanki, Priyathama; Wang, Heqiong; Albury, Bonnie S; Weaver, Rita; Cardona, Saumeth; Umpierrez, Guillermo E

American Diabetes Association

Medicine; Nursing

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know