Risk factors for first and subsequent CVD events in type 1 diabetes: The DCCT/EDIC study
Diabetes Care, ISSN: 1935-5548, Vol: 43, Issue: 4, Page: 867-874
2020
- 65Citations
- 12Usage
- 137Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations65
- Citation Indexes64
- 64
- CrossRef24
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
- Captures137
- Readers137
- 137
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Reducing HbA1c best strategy to avoid initial, subsequent CVD events in type 1 diabetes
Intensive glucose management can help adults with type 1 diabetes avoid an initial or subsequent cardiovascular disease or major adverse cardiovascular disease event, according to findings published in Diabetes Care. “Availability of continuous glucose monitoring and more precise insulin delivery devices that proactively respond to hypoglycemia has made improved glucose control in individuals with
Article Description
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its observational follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) demonstrated the dominant role of glycemia, second only to age, as a risk factor for a first cardiovascular event in type 1 diabetes (T1D). We now investigate the association between established risk factors and the total cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden, including subsequent (i.e., recurrent) events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CVD events in the 1,441 DCCT/EDIC participants were analyzed separately by type (CVD death, acute myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, silent MI, angina, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/coronary artery bypass graft [PTCA/ CABG], and congestive heart failure [CHF]) or as composite outcomes (CVD or major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]). Proportional rate models and conditional models assessed associations between risk factors and CVD outcomes. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 29 years, 239 participants had 421 CVD events, and 120 individuals had 149 MACE. Age was the strongest risk factor for acute MI, silent MI, stroke, and PTCA/CABG, while glycemia was the strongest risk factor for CVD death, CHF, and angina, second strongest for acute MI and PTCA/CABG, third strongest for stroke, and not associated with silent MI. HbA was the strongest modifiable risk factor for a first CVD event (CVD: HR 1.38 [95% CI 1.21, 1.56] per 1% higher HbA; MACE: HR 1.54 [1.30, 1.82]) and also for subsequent CVD events (CVD: incidence ratio [IR] 1.28 [95% CI 1.09, 1.51]; MACE: IR 1.89 [1.36, 2.61]). CONCLUSIONS Intensive glycemic management is recommended to lower the risk of initial CVD events in T1D. After a first event, optimal glycemic control may reduce the risk of recurrent CVD events and should be maintained.
Bibliographic Details
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_epibiostats_facpubs/1357; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_bio_facpubs/53
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082147592&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2292; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00360893; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32001614; https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/43/4/867/35759/Risk-Factors-for-First-and-Subsequent-CVD-Events; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_epibiostats_facpubs/1357; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2358&context=sphhs_epibiostats_facpubs; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_bio_facpubs/53; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=sphhs_bio_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2292; https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/43/4/867
American Diabetes Association
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know