A randomized multicenter trial comparing the glucowatch biographer with standard glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes
Diabetes Care, ISSN: 0149-5992, Vol: 28, Issue: 5, Page: 1101-1106
2005
- 116Citations
- 41Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations116
- Citation Indexes112
- 112
- CrossRef90
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Captures41
- Readers41
- 41
Article Description
OBJECTIVE - This study assesses whether use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) in addition to standard glucose monitoring lowers HbA and reduces hypoglycemia compared with standard glucose monitoring alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In all, 200 subjects aged 7 to <18 years with type 1 diabetes were randomly assigned at five centers to standard glucose monitoring (usual care) or standard glucose monitoring plus GW2B use for 6 months. Study outcomes included HbA values obtained at 6 months and occurrence of severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS - The mean HbA at baseline was 8.0% in both groups; at 6 months, HbA was 7.9% in the usual care group and 8.1% in the GW2B group (95% CI for mean reduction in the GW2B group compared with the usual care group -0.4 to 0.1%; P = 0.15). A decrease in HbA of ≥0.5% was achieved in 21% of the usual care group and 28% of the GW2B group (P = 0.29). Severe hypoglycemia events occurred in 7% of the GW2B group and in 2% of the usual care group (P = 0.10). In the GW2B group, sensor use declined throughout the study from a mean value of 2.1 times/week in the 1st month to 1.5 times/week in the 6th month. Reasons given for declining use included skin irritation (76%), frequent skips (56%), excessive alarms (47%), and inaccurate readings (33%). CONCLUSIONS - Use of the GW2B in addition to standard glucose monitoring did not improve glycemic control or reduce the frequency of severe hypoglycemia. Skin reactions and other problems led to decreasing sensor use over time. © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=18144373420&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.5.1101; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15855573; https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/28/5/1101/27694/A-Randomized-Multicenter-Trial-Comparing-the; https://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.5.1101; https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/28/5/1101
American Diabetes Association
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know