PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Effect of ceramic Veneer opacity and exposure time on the polymerization efficiency of resin cements

Operative Dentistry, ISSN: 0361-7734, Vol: 37, Issue: 3, Page: 281-289
2012
  • 41
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 66
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 80
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    41
  • Captures
    66
  • Social Media
    80
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      80
      • Facebook
        80

Article Description

The objective of this study was to determine the degree of conversion (DC), hardness (H), and modulus of elasticity (E) of a dual-cured resin cement, a light-cured resin cement, and a flowable resin cured through opaque or translucent ceramic with different exposure times. RelyX ARC (dual), RelyX Veneer (light-cured), and Filtek Z350 Flow resin specimens 0.5 mm thick were cured for 40, 80, and 120 seconds through 1-mm thick translucent or opaque feldspathic ceramic disks (n=10). The specimens were stored at 37°C for 24 hours. Half of each specimen was used to test the DC and the other half to test H and E. The DC was determined in a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer in absorbance mode at peaks of 1638 cm and 1610 cm . H and E were determined using nanoindentation with one loading cycle and a maximum load of 400 mN. The data were analyzed with three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the Games-Howell test, and the Pearson correlation test (α=0.05). Statistically significant differences were found for all three factors (material, opacity, and exposure time), as well as interaction between them. The opaque ceramic resulted in lower DC, H, and E than the translucent ceramic for an exposure time of 40 seconds. An exposure time of 120 seconds resulted in a similar DC for all materials, irrespective of the opacity of the ceramic. Materials cured for 120 seconds had higher H and E than those cured for 40 seconds. The exposure time and opacity of the ceramic exerted an influence on the DC, H, and E of the materials evaluated. © 2012 Operative Dentistry, Inc.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know