Numerical simulation of the implant system of a prosthesis and a dental bridge under dynamic loading
Journal of Osseointegration, ISSN: 2036-4121, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 11-16
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Aim The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of masticatory efforts on the intensity and distribution of the equivalent von Mises stress generated in the bone and in the elements that constitute the tooth structure. Materials and methods Three-dimensional numerical analysis by the element method is concerned with a comparative study between two dental structures subjected to dynamic loads. Each of the dental systems is subjected to a mechanical load simulating the functioning of the tooth in three directions: corono-apical, disto-mesial and linguo-buccal. There are two solutions to replace one or more missing teeth. The first solution is to use three dentures that replace the premolar tooth and the two molar teeth. The second solution is to use a dental bridge system consisting of three crowns that aims to replace the missing first molar tooth by relying on two implants. Results The results show that maximum stresses lead to a risk of deterioration of the cancellous bone first to reach the cortical bone and finally the loosening of the implant. Conclusion A dental bridge may be the best option if the neighboring teeth have large fillings and need crowns in the future. And if the tooth or teeth have been lost for a long time, the gum and bone will be reduced and other procedures are needed instead of the dental implant. However, the downside of the dental bridge system is that it gradually leads to bone loss, because it does not stimulate chewing. In fact, the artificial tooth does not rest on the jawbone, which causes this inconvenience.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know