Seismic response evaluation of reinforced high strength concrete columns based on the modified constitutive model
Scientia Iranica, ISSN: 2345-3605, Vol: 25, Issue: 2A, Page: 579-589
2018
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The current study deals with strength and seismic ductility assessment of reinforced High-Strength Concrete (HSC) columns. We have studied the nonlinear response of HSC columns with various reinforcement and axial force ratios subjected to cyclic loading. The study consists of primary verification of mathematical nonlinear model and further calibration to ensure the required accuracy. The existing experimental work is assumed as verification pilot that consists of four columns. Column members differ in the strength and axial force. Concrete has 63.1 MPa mean strength and 0.3% crushing strain. The longitudinal and transverse reinforcements are based on ACI 318 regulations in experiment. We have used the nonlinear fiber-element code in OpenSees environment for the modeling and analysis of models. The existing proposed stress-strain curve is modified to ensure the validity of assessment. Calibration procedure has led to conclusion that the post-yield slope needs to be modified in HSC model as the average value of ACI 363 reference. We have developed twelve extra models to estimate the interaction of concrete strength, rebar ratio, and axial force effect on the seismic performance. Parametric study of calibrated models reveals that the seismic energy dissipation in HSC members is the function of the provided longitudinal reinforcement ratio and lateral confining stirrup amount.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046995887&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4183; http://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_4183.html; http://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_4183_68fd1870e3c02103cd56925343a283e7.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4183; https://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_4183.html
SciTech Solutions
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know