Optimal design of fractional-order digital integrators: An evolutionary approach
Scientia Iranica, ISSN: 2345-3605, Vol: 25, Issue: 6D, Page: 3604-3627
2018
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper presents an optimal approach to design Fractional-Order Digital Integrators (FODIs) using a metaheuristic technique, called Hybrid Flower Pollination Algorithm (HFPA). HFPA is a hybrid approach which combines the exploitation and exploration capabilities of two different evolutionary optimization algorithms, namely, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA). The proposed HFPA based designs are compared with the designs based on Real Coded Genetic Algorithm (RGA), PSO, Differential Evolution (DE), and FPA. Simulation results demonstrate that HFPA based FODIs of all the different orders consistently achieve the best magnitude responses. The proposed technique yields FODIs which surpass all the designs based on both classical and evolutionary optimization approaches reported in recent literature.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know