Irish university governance in transition
Administration, ISSN: 2449-9471, Vol: 72, Issue: 4, Page: 123-146
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Governance structures in Irish universities are undergoing a significant transformation as the passing of new legislation in October 2022, the Higher Education Authority (HEA) Act, heralded the beginning of a new relationship between the Irish state, the universities and their regulator, the HEA. This paper provides an analysis of the changes taking place in university governance with the implementation of the HEA Act and locates the current developments in the context of wider governance reforms that have taken place across European higher education. The findings of an empirical research study involving elite interviews with key stakeholders in Irish higher education governance are also presented; the results capture the early experience of implementing governance reform, with key stakeholders agreeing that smaller supervisory boards result in better governance, more rigour in the way board members approach their roles, and greater accountability required of executives, which is expected to lead to greater tension between boards and their executives. The paper concludes by identifying opportunities for further research with a follow-up study of the impact of the governance reforms on board effectiveness proposed once the new governing boards have served a full term.
Bibliographic Details
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know