Espacios agrarios en conflicto en La Meseta Purhépecha. Capacuaro-Pomacuarán y Ocumicho-Tangancícuaro
Relaciones Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, ISSN: 0185-3929, Vol: 39, Issue: 156, Page: 257-288
2018
- 926Usage
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Resumen: Presentamos un panorama general de los conflictos agrarios en Michoacán, para luego centrarnos en dos casos, uno que comprende comunidad con comunidad y el otro que sostiene una comunidad con un ejido; el primero ha sido resuelto según información oficial, mientras que el segundo continúa en la relación de asuntos pendientes. Esbozamos algunos elementos que ayuden a acercarnos al entendimiento de la complejidad de la problemática y de sus posibles soluciones. También analizamos las políticas gubernamentales de atención, privilegiando la evaluación que hacen los propios sujetos colectivos como resultado de su experiencia concreta.
Bibliographic Details
https://revistarelaciones.colmich.edu.mx/index.php/relaciones/article/view/396; http://dx.doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v39i156.396; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-39292018000400257&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-39292018000400257&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0185-39292018000400257; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-39292018000400257; https://dx.doi.org/10.24901/rehs.v39i156.396
Relaciones Estudios de Historia y Sociedad
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know