Risk reducing-mastectomy. Experience of the Hospital Universitario Austral Breast Center
Revista Argentina de Cirugia(Argentina), ISSN: 2250-639X, Vol: 112, Issue: 1, Page: 16-22
2020
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: The number of risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) has increased over the past years as genetic testing has become more readily available. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of our institution with RRM. Material and methods: The analysis included healthy patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral RRM and those with a history of breast cancer who underwent contralateral RRM. Patients with mastectomies performed as treatment of breast cancer were not considered, but those with contralateral mastectomies were included. Results: Seventy RRM were performed in 49 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the analysis. Mean age was 44 years (range: 34-64). The nipple-Areola complex was preserved in 60 cases. In 50 cases, a prosthesis was implanted for breast reconstruction during the same procedure. The breast was approach through a radial incision in the upper outer quadrant in 57 patients. Fifty-seven patients did not present complications, and in the rest of the cases the implant failed in only one (1.4%) case. An occult breast cancer was detected in only one patient. During follow-up, one patient developed a small carcinoma in the operated breast. Conclusion: RRM is a valid and safe option for women at high risk for breast cancer, since it significantly reduces the probability of developing the disease, with good aesthetic results and a high level of patient satisfaction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150065315&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.25132/raac.v112.n1.1391.es; http://aac.org.ar/revista/2020/112/Enero-Febrero-Marzo/4.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.25132/raac.v112.n1.1391.es; https://aac.org.ar/revista/2020/112/Enero-Febrero-Marzo/4.pdf
Asociacion Argentina de Cirugia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know