Behavior of piglets after castration with or without carbon dioxide anesthesia
Journal of Animal Science, ISSN: 0021-8812, Vol: 89, Issue: 10, Page: 3310-3317
2011
- 22Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef10
- Captures53
- Readers53
- 53
Article Description
Surgical castration of male piglets without anesthesia is a routine management practice conducted on commercial pig farms. For animal welfare reasons, it would be beneficial to develop methods of practical pain relief. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of providing CO2 anesthesia before castration on the behavior of piglets for up to 8 d after castration in comparison with piglets castrated without anesthesia. In 3 successive replicates, the behavior of 186 male piglets castrated with (n = 95) or without (n = 91) anesthesia was observed for up to 8 d after castration. All piglets in a given replicate were castrated on the same day, before 8 d of age. Behavioral observations were carried out in accordance with a continuous focal sampling procedure that began immediately after castration and continued for a period of 1 wk. Barrows anesthetized with CO before castration displayed more interactive behaviors during the overall observationperiod than the other barrows (P = 0.0412), which may indicate better welfare. Assessing all observationperiods separately, differences in activity at the udder,lying, walking, and interactive behaviors appeared to support the beneficial effect of providing CO anesthesia before castration. However, these differences varied over time between treatment groups. The most important conclusion was that piglets castrated with or without CO anesthesia displayed behaviors indicative of pain and discomfort for up to 6 d after castration. Therefore, additional analgesia may be necessary to eliminate the long-term pain caused by castration even in piglets anesthetized with CO2 before castration. © 2011 American Society of Animal Science, All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80053046265&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3104; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21531848; https://academic.oup.com/jas/article/89/10/3310-3317/4772006; https://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3104; https://academic.oup.com/jas/article-abstract/89/10/3310/4772006?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know