Structure as architectural poetics
ZARCH, ISSN: 2387-0346, Issue: 11, Page: 8-31
2018
- 1Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Getting contemporary architects to look back at the shaping value of architectural structure is one of the key objectives of this reflection on the different between building and composing in relation to the theory of the project. The structure does not embody a simple relationship between technique and construction, but rather mediates between the space and the site, intensifying the site and building the space. Structural clarity leads to degrees of freedom in the formal solution. It also enables the possibility of including complexity and mediation of what is real to avoid schematic idealism and self-centred formalism. By linking construction and representation, the structure allows sensing the form, and, as an architectural instrument, avoids today’s clumsy superimposing of a significant enclosure over a functional, technologically effective diagram. The structure supports the architectural ideal by conferring a disciplinary basis for project development, since it sets off tectonic control and constructive logic with mobility and lability of what is formal. This is an entirely coherent resource for executive procedures in practice, as a poetic expression of materials, elements and techniques that confer visibility to the constructive features of a project.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064621113&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018113205; https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/zarch/article/view/3205; https://papiro.unizar.es/ojs/index.php/zarch/article/download/3205/2929; https://dx.doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2018113205
Universidad de Zaragoza
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know