Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Bentonite (dioctahedral montmorillonite) for all species
EFSA Journal, ISSN: 1831-4732, Vol: 9, Issue: 6
2011
- 15Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In a previous opinion on bentonite, the Panel concluded that it has the potential to be efficacious as aflatoxin binder in feed of dairy cows, and extended this conclusion to all ruminants. However, the Panel was not in a position to assess the efficacy of the bentonite under application as aflatoxin binder for any other animal species than ruminants due to the absence of data. The applicant has submitted a supplementary dossier to support the efficacy of the additive for all species. However, no new efficacy studies have been provided, only reference to published data. The FEEDAP Panel fully reviewed all data, considerations and statements provided by the applicant in the supplementary dossier. No convincing argument or experimental result could be found which would alter the former position of the Panel. The FEEDAP Panel reiterates therefore, its former conclusion that it can not assess the efficacy of the bentonite under application as aflatoxin binder for any other animal species than ruminants due to the absence of appropriate in vivo data.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know