Quantification and determination of normal I-Meta iodobenzylguanidine heart-to-Mediastinum ratio (HMR) from cardiac SPECT/CT and correlation with planar HMR
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, ISSN: 2159-662X, Vol: 59, Issue: 4, Page: 652-658
2018
- 6Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef3
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Assessment of cardiac I-meta iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) uptake relies on the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) derived from planar images. We have developed novel semiautomated quantitative methodologies for assessing HMR from SPECT images using a dedicated cardiac multipinhole SPECT/CT system and determined the lower limit of normal (LLN) SPECT-derived HMR and the correlation to planar-derived HMR. Methods: Twenty-one healthy volunteers were injected with I-mIBG and imaged using 2 different cameras. Planar images were acquired using a conventional SPECT camera equipped with parallel hole collimators, and hybrid SPECT/ CT images were acquired using a dedicated cardiac SPECT system with 19 pinhole collimators interfaced with 64-slice CT. Planar HMR was calculated as per standard guidelines (manual traditional method) and elliptic region-of-interest (Elip-ROI) and region-growing (RG-ROI) techniques. SPECT HMR was quantified using a new method that incorporates various cardiac and mediastinal segmentation schemes in which upper and lower limits of the heart were determined from CT and the left ventricular ROI, and mean counts were calculated using Elip-ROI and RG-ROI techniques. Mean counts in mediastinal ROI were computed from a fixed volume in 3 different regions: upper mediastinum (UM), lower mediastinum (LM), and contralateral lung (CL). HMRs were processed by 2 observers, and reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Planar HMR calculated using the RG-ROI method showed highest intra- and interobserver levels of agreement compared with Elip-ROI and manual traditional methods. SPECT HMR calculated on the basis of UM, LM, and CL background regions showed excellent intra- and interobserver agreement. SPECT HMR with UM resulted in highest correlation (R 5 0.91) with planar HMR compared with that with LM (R 5 0.74) and CL (R 5 0.73). The LLN of SPECT HMR with UM and that of planar HMR was calculated as 5.5 and 1.6, respectively. The normal values of SPECT-derived HMR and planar-derived HMR were correlated linearly. Conclusion: We reconfirmed the previous planar HMR threshold and determined SPECT LLN HMR for SPECT. Planar HMR can be estimated from SPECT HMR via a simple linear regression equation, allowing use of the new cardiac-dedicated SPECT camera for I-mIBG imaging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044747857&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.197152; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28916622; http://jnm.snmjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.2967/jnumed.117.197152; https://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.197152; https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/4/652
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know