El tabique de cemento, un material de la Revolución mexicana. Un estudio de su valor histórico y sus propiedades físicomecánicas
Intervención, ISSN: 2007-249X, Vol: 1, Issue: 27, Page: 12-52
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Resumen El objeto de este estudio es reconocer la importancia histórica del tabique de cemento, que entró en uso en la arquitectura doméstica de la Ciudad de México en el periodo revolucionario (1910-1920), y argumentar por qué cayó en desuso tan marcadamente. Se utilizó un método inductivo-deductivo en cuatro pasos. Se argumentó que, no obstante que el empleo del tabique de cemento en la construcción de vivienda del México revolucionario permitió transitar de un proceso más artesanal a uno tecnificado, al final, olvidado por la llegada del concreto armado, su importancia no trascendió en el tiempo.
Bibliographic Details
https://revistas.inah.gob.mx/index.php/intervencion/article/view/22134/23619; http://dx.doi.org/10.30763/intervencion.277.v1n27.56.2023; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-249X2023000100012&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2007-249X2023000100012&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-249X2023000100012; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2007-249X2023000100012; https://dx.doi.org/10.30763/intervencion.277.v1n27.56.2023; https://revistaintervencion.inah.gob.mx/index.php/intervencion/article/view/6455
Intervencion, Revista Internacional de Conservacion, Restauracion y Museologia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know