Application of sepsis calculator in newborns with suspected infection
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, ISSN: 1476-4954, Vol: 29, Issue: 23, Page: 3860-3865
2016
- 52Citations
- 97Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations52
- Citation Indexes51
- 51
- CrossRef25
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures97
- Readers97
- 97
Article Description
Objective: To compare actual antibiotic use to the stratification based on the sepsis calculator in newborns with suspected early onset sepsis (EOS). To investigate differences in EOS risk and vital signs between newborns that received early (<12 h) versus late antibiotics (≥12 h of life). Methods: Newborns born ≥34 weeks gestation in 2014 treated with antibiotics started within 72 h after birth were included. We calculated the risk per 1000 live births and retrospectively assigned each newborn to one of four recommended categories using the sepsis calculator. Results: There were 2094 newborns, 111 (5.3%) received antibiotics and 108 newborns were included. The incidence of culture-proven EOS was 0.096%. In 57 newborns, the advice of the sepsis calculator was not to start antibiotic therapy. Antibiotic treatment was started early in 66 (61%) and late in 42 (39%) newborns. In the “late treatment” group, clinical condition deteriorated, including two newborns with culture-proven EOS. Tachypnea and respiratory distress were significantly more present. Conclusion: Antibiotic use could be reduced by more than 50%. Newborns with initial low sepsis risk score clinically deteriorated beyond 12 h of life. Continuous good clinical observation remains very important. Prospective validation is necessary to evaluate the safety of this approach.
Bibliographic Details
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know