Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: Examples of poor progress following cochlear implantation
Audiological Medicine, ISSN: 1651-3835, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 143-150
2012
- 9Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The majority of babies with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) spend 48 h or more in the Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU), and the current UK recommendations for the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme state that babies admitted to the SCBU should undergo hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions together with automated auditory brainstem response audiometry, in order to identify babies affected with the condition. Current recommendations propose that individuals affected with ANSD should be considered candidates for cochlear implantation. It has been suggested that in patients with ANSD, the presence or absence of cortical electric response audiometry (CERA) responses can help to predict favourable or unfavourable prognosis in auditory language development and comprehension post implantation. We describe two individuals who had not been in SCBU, but came from the well baby population yet satisfied the diagnostic criteria for ANSD. These two patients underwent cochlear implantation, but made poor progress in auditory language development and speech understanding on subsequent follow-up. We suggest that ANSD should be considered in all cases of infants who undergo cochlear implantation but do not make subsequent good progress in auditory language development and speech understanding. We further suggest that CERA be performed prior to cochlear implantation in patients satisfying the diagnostic criteria for ANSD, as the results can assist in predicting post implantation progress in auditory language development and speech understanding. © 2012 Informa Healthcare.
Bibliographic Details
Informa Healthcare
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know