Subjective analysis of university students on their academic performance in face-to-face mode
European Public and Social Innovation Review, ISSN: 2529-9824, Vol: 9, Page: 1-16
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: One of the factors that cause university students to decide to abandon their studies is the issue of their academic performance, so it is extremely important to have a clear picture of how they perceive their performance in the classroom. Methodology: Quantitative approach, cross-sectional and analytical, its method was inductive-deductive; the sample consisted of 184 students of the on-site modality of a Public University of Peru; the instrument used was the RAU Scale of University Academic Performance. Results: The mean age was 18 years; 53,8% were female and 46,2% male. Regarding academic performance, 15,8% of university students perceive their level as low and 84,2% as medium; 64,1% are at the medium level for academic activities, 51,6% are at the low level for dedication to study and 75,5% are at the high level for lack of organization of didactic resources. Discussion: There are studies where similar results have been obtained, but no associated factors have been found. Conclusions: Students need to develop strategies to improve their academic performance.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know