Nurses' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practices Concerning Evidence-BasedPractice:ACross-SectionalStudy
Malaysian Journal of Nursing, ISSN: 2462-246X, Vol: 15, Issue: 4, Page: 4-11
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of individual variables among staff nurses on their knowledge, attitudes, and implementation of evidence-based practice in the City of Mosul, Iraq. Additionally, the study aims to identify the characteristics that either facilitate or hinder the implementation of evidence-based practice. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational design was used. The principles outlined in the STROBE Checklist is followed while sharing this study. A sample of 250 staff nurses was conveniently picked from five hospitals in Mosul, Iraq. The survey consisted of the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire and individual variables as questions. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Results: The average age of the participants was 31.0 years, with a standard deviation of 5.5 years. The majority of participants indicated a lack of knowledge, abilities, and experience in evidence-based practice (EBP), while expressing moderate views towards EBP. The area of study revealed distinct disparities in average scores for knowledge or skills, attitudes, and practice. Nurses had significantly greater knowledge, abilities, and practice of evidence-based practice (EBP) compared to midwives (p<0.001). Nurses and midwives who had master's degrees demonstrated superior knowledge, abilities, and implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP), as well as more favorable attitudes compared to nurses with bachelor's degrees (p<0.001). Conclusion: Nurses in the city of Mosul are eager to participate in the evidence-based practice approach. Nevertheless, nurses have recognized the need to enhance their knowledge and abilities to actively engage in the process.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know