The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies
Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, ISSN: 1940-1019, Vol: 139, Issue: 5, Page: 439-457
2005
- 1,195Citations
- 1,817Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1,195
- Citation Indexes1,180
- 1,180
- CrossRef417
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti6
- Policy Citations14
- Policy Citation14
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures1,817
- Readers1,817
- 1,817
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- News3
Most Recent News
The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy on Pregnancy Stress and Smartphone Addiction of Pregnant Women in Late Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, People’s Republic of China Correspondence: Jingli Sun, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,
Article Description
General self-efficacy is the belief in one's competence to cope with a broad range of stressful or challenging demands, whereas specific self-efficacy is constrained to a particular task at hand. Relations between general self-efficacy and social cognitive variables (intention, implementation intentions, outcome expectancies, and self-regulation), behavior-specific self-efficacy, health behaviors, well-being, and coping strategies were examined among 1,933 respondents in 3 countries: Germany (n = 633), Poland (n = 359), and South Korea (n = 941). Participants were between 16 and 86 years old, and some were dealing with stressful situations such as recovery from myocardial events or tumor surgery. Perceived self-efficacy was measured by means of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (R. Schwarzer & M. Jerusalem, 1995). Meta-analysis was used to determine population effect sizes for four sets of variables. Across countries and samples, there is consistent evidence for associations between perceived self-efficacy and the variables under study confirming the validity of the psychometric scale. General self-efficacy appears to be a universal construct that yields meaningful relations with other psychological constructs. © 2005 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27844568564&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/jrlp.139.5.439-457; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16285214; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know