Cost optimal planning with multi-valued landmarks
AI Communications, ISSN: 0921-7126, Vol: 28, Issue: 3, Page: 579-590
2015
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Landmark based heuristics are among the most accurate current known admissible heuristics for cost optimal planning. A disjunctive action landmark can be seen as a form of at-least-one constraint on the actions it contains. In many domains, there are many critical propositions which have to be established for a number of times. Previous landmarks are too weak to express this kind of general cardinality constraints. In this paper, we propose to generalize landmarks to multi-valued landmarks to model general cardinality constraints in cost optimal planning. We show existence of complete multi-valued landmark sets by explicitly constructing complete multi-valued action landmark sets for general planning tasks. Because exact lower bounds of general multi-valued action landmarks are intractable to extract and exploit, we introduce multi-valued proposition landmarks from which multi-valued action landmarks can be efficiently induced. Finally, we devise a linear programming based multi-valued landmark heuristic h lpml which extracts and exploits multi-valued landmarks using a linear programming solver. h lpml is guaranteed to be admissible and can be computed in polynomial time. Experimental evaluation on benchmark domains shows h lpml beats state-of-the-art admissible heuristic in terms of heuristic accuracy and achieves better overall coverage performance at the cost of using more CPU time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84938082762&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/aic-140622; https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/AIC-140622; http://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/AIC-140622; https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/aic-140622; https://content.iospress.com:443/articles/ai-communications/aic622
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know