Identification of hub genes and pathways in cholangiocarcinoma by coexpression analysis
Cancer Biomarkers, ISSN: 1875-8592, Vol: 27, Issue: 4, Page: 505-517
2020
- 8Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef8
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common biliary malignancy worldwide. However, the molecular mechanisms of its tumorigenesis and progression are still largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the hub genes and pathways associated with CCA prognosis by coexpression analysis. METHODS: A coexpression network complex was constructed using the top 20% most variant genes in the GSE89748 dataset to find modules associated with prognosis related clinical trait-histology. The hub genes in the clinically significant modules were defined as candidates if they were common in both the coexpression network and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Afterwards, survival analysis, expression level analysis and a series of bioinformatic analysis were used to validate the hub genes. RESULTS: Twenty-five modules were obtained, and the cyan, light cyan and red modules regarded as closely associated with histology were selected. Subsequently, combining the PPI network complexes and coexpression networks, we screened 20 candidates. After expression and survival analysis, 10 real hub genes (LIMA1, HDAC1, ITGA3, ACTR3, GSK3B, ITGA2, THOC2, PTGES3, HEATR1 and ILF2) were finally identified. Additionally, functional enrichment analysis revealed that the hub genes were mainly enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study identified 10 hub genes and cell cycle-related pathways were closely related to CCA development, progression and prognosis, which may contribute to CCA diagnosis and treatment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083322376&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/cbm-190038; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116234; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/CBM-190038; https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/cbm-190038; https://content.iospress.com:443/articles/cancer-biomarkers/cbm190038
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know