A comparative study on ML algorithms and ANN on fault diagnosis of a two-stage helical gearbox
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, ISSN: 1875-8967, Vol: 46, Issue: 4, Page: 9819-9840
2024
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures7
- Readers7
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Researcher at School of Mechanical Engineering Has Published New Data on Artificial Neural Networks (A comparative study on ML algorithms and ANN on fault diagnosis of a two-stage helical gearbox)
2024 MAR 19 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Network Daily News -- Researchers detail new data in artificial neural networks. According
Article Description
In the modern world, condition monitoring is crucial to the predictive maintenance of machinery. Gearboxes are widely used in machineries and auto motives to achieve the variable speeds. The major problem in gearbox is catastrophic failure due to heavy loads, corrosion and erosion, results in economic loss and creates high safety risks. So, it is necessary to provide condition monitoring technique to detect and diagnose failures, to achieve cost benefits to industry. The main purpose of this study to use Machine Learning (ML) algorithms and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) which are very powerful and reliable tool for fault detection and its most important attribute is its ability to efficiently detect non-stationary, non-periodic, transient features of the vibration signal. To do the vibration study, an experimental setup was created, and various faults were induced faults of various kinds that usually occurred in the gearbox. The gear in the gear train was subjected to vibration analysis which was captured via a sensor. Signal processing was carried out using MATLAB Toolbox. To automatically identify the flaws in the helical gearbox, an artificial neural network (ANN) and several machines learning methods, including KNN, decision tree, random forest, and SMV, were trained by creating a database from the experiment conducted. The outcomes showed potential in accurately classifying the faults. The results show that ANN has the highest accuracy of 99.6% with a 6.5662 seconds computational time while SVM has the lowest accuracy of 96% among them along with the highest computational time of 21.324 seconds.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193716155&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jifs-233602; https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/JIFS-233602; https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jifs-233602; https://content.iospress.com:443/articles/journal-of-intelligent-and-fuzzy-systems/ifs233602
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know