Novel U-net based deep neural networks for transmission tomography
Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, ISSN: 0895-3996, Vol: 30, Issue: 1, Page: 13-31
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
BACKGROUND: The fusion of computer tomography and deep learning is an effective way of achieving improved image quality and artifact reduction in reconstructed images. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we present two novel neural network architectures for tomographic reconstruction with reduced effects of beam hardening and electrical noise. METHODS: In the case of the proposed novel architectures, the image reconstruction step is located inside the neural networks, which allows the network to be trained by taking the mathematical model of the projections into account. This strong connection enables us to enhance the projection data and the reconstructed image together. We tested the two proposed models against three other methods on two datasets. The datasets contain physically correct simulated data, and they show strong signs of beam hardening and electrical noise. We also performed a numerical evaluation of the neural networks on the reconstructed images according to three error measurements and provided a scoring system of the methods derived from the three measures. RESULTS: The results showed the superiority of the novel architecture called TomoNet2. TomoNet2 improved the quality of the images according to the average Structural Similarity Index from 0.9372 to 0.9977 and 0.9519 to 0.9886 on the two data sets, when compared to the FBP method. This network also yielded the best results for 79.2 and 53.0 percent for the two datasets according to Peak-Signal-To-Noise-Ratio compared to the other improvement techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our experimental results showed that the reconstruction step used in skip connections in deep neural networks improves the quality of the reconstructions. We are confident that our proposed method can be effectively applied to other datasets for tomographic purposes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123905578&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/xst-210962; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34806643; https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/XST-210962; https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/xst-210962; https://content.iospress.com:443/articles/journal-of-x-ray-science-and-technology/xst210962
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know