Demonstration propter quid and fourth per se mode in Buridan's Summulae de demonstrationibus
Rivista di Storia della Filosofia, ISSN: 0393-2516, Issue: 3, Page: 505-528
2020
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Demonstration propter quid and fourth per se mode in Buridan's Summulae de demonstrationibus. Some recent studies show in John Buridan a noteworthy degree of originality and innovation in his treatment of Aristotle's theory of science, for example concerning the doctrines of subalternation of the sciences, or some aspects of the doctrine of definition, which are between the main themes of Posterior Analytics. In this paper, two other topics are investigated: first, the interpretation of the fourth mode of per se predication, about which Buridan in the Summulae proposes a new, original and interesting view definitely overcoming either the previous exegetical tradition, or the opinion Buridan himself expresses in his Questiones on Aristotle's text. The second is the topic of propter quid demonstration, that Buridan deepens also in order to go beyond the old and maybe almost outdated quaestio de medio demonstrationis. But, what is more, he is higly consistent and very original in connecting these two topics: so, he gives a new unity and systematic order also to some other minor aspect of his reading of Aristotelian theory.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096797923&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sf2020-003007; https://www.medra.org/servlet/MRService?lang=ita&hdl=10.3280/SF2020-003007; https://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sf2020-003007; https://www.medra.org:443/servlet/MREngine?hdl=10.3280/SF2020-003007
Franco Angeli
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know