The crisis of journalism and State retraction policies in Argentina, Brazil and Chile
Comunicacion y Sociedad (Mexico), ISSN: 2448-9042, Vol: 2020, Page: 1-22
2020
- 7Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
This article aims to study how the ownership structure of the media system and the role of the State are linked to the deterioration of journalistic work and the exercise of freedom of speech. From the Political Economy of Journalism and the discussions on the right to information, a comparative study is proposed to contrast the situation in Brazil, Argentina and Chile between 2016 and 2018. It is concluded that the high concentration in the three media systems, along with the retraction of the State as regulator and content producer, deepen a crisis that threatens journalistic activity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090714699&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2020.7622; https://comunicacionysociedad.cucsh.udg.mx/index.php/comsoc/article/view/e7622; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-252X2020000100106&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0188-252X2020000100106&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-252X2020000100106; http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0188-252X2020000100106; https://dx.doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2020.7622
Universidad de Guadalajara
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know