Comparison of water-based foam and carbon dioxide gas emergency depopulation methods of turkeys
Poultry Science, ISSN: 0032-5791, Vol: 92, Issue: 12, Page: 3144-3148
2013
- 7Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Recommended response strategies for outbreaks of avian influenza and other highly contagious poultry diseases include surveillance, quarantine, depopulation, disposal, and decontamination. The best methods of emergency mass depopulation should maximize human health and safety while minimizing disease spread and animal welfare concerns. The goal of this project was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 mass depopulation methods on adult tom turkeys. The methods tested were carbon dioxide gassing and water-based foam. The time to unconsciousness, motion cessation, brain death, and altered terminal cardiac activity were recorded for each bird through the use of an electroencephalogram, accelerometer, and electrocardiogram. Critical times for physiological events were extracted from sensor data and compiled in a spreadsheet for statistical analysis. A statistically significant difference was observed in time to brain death, with water-based foam resulting in faster brain death (µ = 190 s) than CO 2 gas (µ = 242 s). Though not statistically significant, differences were found comparing the time to unconsciousness (foam: µ = 64 s; CO 2 gas: µ = 90 s), motion cessation (foam: µ = 182 s; CO 2 gas: µ = 153 s), and altered terminal cardiac activity (foam: µ = 208 s; CO 2 gas µ = 242 s) between foam and CO 2 depopulation treatments. The results of this study demonstrate that water-based foam can be used to effectively depopulate market size male turkeys.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119384329; http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03341; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887634772&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24235223; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0032579119384329; https://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03341
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know