Comparative study of minutiae selection methods for digital fingerprints
Frontiers in Big Data, ISSN: 2624-909X, Vol: 6, Page: 1146034
2023
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Biometric systems are more and more used for many applications (physical access control, e-payment, etc.). Digital fingerprint is an interesting biometric modality as it can easily be used for embedded systems (smartcard, smartphone, and smartwatch). A fingerprint template is composed of a set of minutiae used for their comparison. In embedded systems, a secure element is in general used to store and compare fingerprint templates to meet security and privacy requirements. Nevertheless, it is necessary to select a subset of minutiae from a template due to storage and computation constraints. In this study, we present, a comparative study of the main minutiae selection methods from the literature. The considered methods require no further information like the raw image. Experimental results show their relative performance when using different matching algorithms and datasets. We identified that some methods can be used within different contexts (enrollment or verification) with minimal degradation of performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85159920431&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1146034; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37143776; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdata.2023.1146034/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1146034; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/big-data/articles/10.3389/fdata.2023.1146034/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know