Comparison of frozen-thaw blastocyst transfer strategies in women aged 35–40 years: a retrospective study
Frontiers in Endocrinology, ISSN: 1664-2392, Vol: 14, Page: 1141605
2023
- 2Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Objective: To compare the effects of five different frozen-thaw embryo transfer (FET) strategies in women aged 35–40 years. Methods: Data from 1,060 patients were divided into five groups according to the number and quality of transferred blastocysts: a high-quality single blastocyst group (group A, n= 303), a high-quality double blastocysts group (group B, n= 176), a high-quality plus poor-quality double blastocysts group (group C, n= 273), a poor-quality double blastocysts group (group D, n= 189), and a poor-quality single blastocyst group (group E, n= 119). Comparative analyses were then performed between groups with regard to primary conditions, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. Results: Group A had the lowest twin pregnancy rate (1.97%) and incidence of low-birth-weight infants (3.45%), which were significantly different from groups B, C, and D. In addition, the preterm birth rate (7.89%), neonatal birth weight (3300 g [3000, 3637.5]), and neonatal birth age (39.14 weeks [38.43, 39.61]) in group A were different from those in groups B and C. Double blastocyst transfer (DBT) was associated with a 20.558-fold (Risk Ratio [RR]=20.558, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.628–63.763) and 3.091-fold (RR=3.091, 95% CI, 1.69–5.653) increased risk of twin pregnancy and preterm delivery in unadjusted analysis, respectively, when compared with single blastocyst transfer (SBT). In the adjusted analysis, we observed similar risk estimates (adjusted RR=26.501, 95% CI, 8.503–82.592; adjusted RR=3.586, 95% CI, 1.899–6.769). Conclusion: Although, high-quality SBT resulted in a lower live birth rate than high-quality DBT, it also significantly reduced the risk of adverse pregnancies, thus resulting in more benefits for both the mother and baby. Collectively, our data indicate that high-quality SBT remains the optimal FET strategy for women aged 35–40 years and warrants further clinical application.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164453075&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1141605; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404307; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1141605/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1141605; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1141605/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know