Using Genomics to Link Populations of an Invasive Species to Its Potential Sources
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, ISSN: 2296-701X, Vol: 9
2021
- 10Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The introduction and subsequent range expansion of the Northern snakehead (Channa argus: Channidae, Anabantiformes) is one of a growing number of problematic biological invasions in the United States. This harmful aquatic invasive species is a predatory freshwater fish native to northeastern Asia that, following deliberate introduction, has established itself in multiple water basins in the eastern United States, as well as expanding its range into the Midwest. Previous work assessed the population structure and estimated the long-term effective population sizes of the populations present in the United States, but the source of the initial introduction(s) to the U.S. remains unidentified. Building on earlier work, we used whole genome scans (2b-RAD genomic sequencing) to analyze single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from C. argus to screen the genomes of these invasive fish from United States waters and from three sites in their native range in China. We recovered 2,822 SNP loci from genomic DNA extracted from 164 fish sampled from the eastern United States and Arkansas (Mississippi River basin), plus 30 fish sampled from three regions of the Yangtze River basin in China (n = 10 individuals per basin). Our results provide evidence supporting the Yangtze River basin in China, specifically the Bohu and/or Liangzi lakes, is a likely source of the C. argus introductions in multiple regions of the U.S., including the Lower Hudson River basin, Upper Hudson River basin and Philadelphia (Lower Delaware River basin). This information, in conjunction with additional sampling from the native range, will help to determine the source(s) of introduction for the other U.S. populations. Additionally, this work will provide valuable information for management to help prevent and manage future introductions into United States waterways, as well as aid in the development of more targeted strategies to regulate established populations and inhibit further spread.
Bibliographic Details
10.3389/fevo.2021.575599; 10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s001; 10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s003; 10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101213894&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599/supplementary-material/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s001; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s001; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599/supplementary-material/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s003; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s003; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599/supplementary-material/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s002; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s002; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s002; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s003; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.575599.s001
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know