Clinical Utility of Exome Sequencing and Reinterpreting Genetic Test Results in Children and Adults With Epilepsy
Frontiers in Genetics, ISSN: 1664-8021, Vol: 11, Page: 591434
2020
- 11Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
The clinical utility of genetic testing for epilepsy has been enhanced with the advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology along with the rapid updating of publicly available databases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of NGS and assess the value of reinterpreting genetic test results in children and adults with epilepsy. We performed genetic testing on 200 patients, including 82 children and 118 adults. The results were classified into three categories: positive, inconclusive, or negative. The reinterpretation of inconclusive results was conducted in April 2020. Overall, we identified disease-causing variants in 12% of the patients in the original analysis, and 14.5% at reinterpretation. The diagnostic yield for adults with epilepsy was similar to that for children (11 vs. 19.5%, p = 0.145). After reinterpretation, 9 of the 86 patients who initially had inconclusive results obtained a clinically significant change in diagnosis. Among these nine revised cases, five obtained positive diagnoses, representing a diagnosis rate of 5.8% (5/86). Manual searches for additional evidence of pathogenicity for candidate variants and updated patient clinical information were the main reasons for diagnostic reclassification. This study emphasizes the diagnostic potential of combining NGS and reinterpretation of inconclusive genetic test reports in children and adults with epilepsy.
Bibliographic Details
10.3389/fgene.2020.591434; 10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s005; 10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s002; 10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s001; 10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s004; 10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098722775&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391346; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/supplementary-material/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s005; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s005; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/supplementary-material/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s002; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s002; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/supplementary-material/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s001; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s001; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/supplementary-material/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s004; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s004; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/supplementary-material/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s003; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s003; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s002; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s001; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s005; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s004; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434.s003; https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.591434/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know