Technical feasibility of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy by next-generation DNA sequencing
Frontiers in Genetics, ISSN: 1664-8021, Vol: 14, Page: 1095600
2023
- 9Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Newborn screening (NBS) assays for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) typically use a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay to identify individuals with homozygous deletion in exon 7 of the SMN1 gene. Due to high DNA sequence homology between SMN1 and SMN2, it has previously been difficult to accurately bioinformatically map short reads from next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) to SMN1, resulting in low analytical performance and preventing NGS being used for SMA screening. Advances in bioinformatics have allowed NGS to be used in diagnostic settings, but to date these assays have not reached the scale required for high volume population newborn screening and have not been performed on the dried blood spot samples that NBS programs currently use. Here we integrate an NGS assay using hybridisation-based capture with a customised bioinformatics algorithm and purpose designed high throughput reporting software into an existing NBS program to achieve a laboratory workflow for population SMA screening. We tested the NGS assay on over 2500 newborns born over 2 weeks in a NBS program in a technical feasibility study and show high sensitivity and specificity. Our results suggest NGS may be an alternate method for SMA screening by NBS programs, providing a multiplex testing platform on which potentially hundreds of inherited conditions could be simultaneously tested.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147127066&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1095600; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36713073; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1095600/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1095600; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1095600/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know