Augmenting E Protein Activity Impairs cDC2 Differentiation at the Pre-cDC Stage
Frontiers in Immunology, ISSN: 1664-3224, Vol: 11, Page: 577718
2020
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Dendritic cell (DC) specification and differentiation are controlled by a circuit of transcription factors, which regulate the expression of DC effector genes as well as the transcription factors themselves. E proteins are a widely expressed basic helix-loop-helix family of transcription factors whose activity is suppressed by their inhibitors, ID proteins. Loss-of-function studies have demonstrated the essential role of both E and ID proteins in different aspects of DC development. In this study, we employed a gain-of-function approach to illustrate the importance of the temporal control of E protein function in maintaining balanced differentiation of conventional DC (cDC) subsets, cDC1 and cDC2. We expressed an E protein mutant, ET2, which dimerizes with endogenous E proteins to overcome inhibition by ID proteins and activate the transcription of E protein targets. Induction of ET2 expression at the hematopoietic progenitor stage led to a dramatic reduction in cDC2 precursors (pre-cDC2s) with little impact on pre-cDC1s. Consequently, we observed decreased numbers of cDC2s in the spleen and lung, as well as in FLT3L-driven bone marrow-derived DC cultures. Furthermore, in mice bearing ET2, we detected increased expression of the IRF8 transcription factor in cDC2s, in which IRF8 is normally down-regulated and IRF4 up-regulated. This aberrant expression of IRF8 induced by ET2 may contribute to the impairment of cDC2 differentiation. In addition, analyses of the transcriptomes of splenic cDC1s and cDC2s revealed that ET2 expression led to a shift, at least in part, of the transcriptional profile characteristic of cDC2s to that of cDC1. Together, these results suggest that a precise control of E protein activity is crucial for balanced DC differentiation.
Bibliographic Details
10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718; 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s003; 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s004; 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s002; 10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098686646&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391258; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/supplementary-material/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s003; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s003; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/supplementary-material/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s004; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s004; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/supplementary-material/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s002; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s002; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/supplementary-material/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s001; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s001; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s001; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s002; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s003; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718.s004; https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577718/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know