Feedback control of collective dynamics in an oscillator population with time-dependent connectivity
Frontiers in Network Physiology, ISSN: 2674-0109, Vol: 4, Page: 1358146
2024
- 3Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
Article Description
We present a numerical study of pulsatile feedback-based control of synchrony level in a highly-interconnected oscillatory network. We focus on a nontrivial case when the system is close to the synchronization transition point and exhibits collective rhythm with strong amplitude modulation. We pay special attention to technical but essential steps like causal real-time extraction of the signal of interest from a noisy measurement and estimation of instantaneous phase and amplitude. The feedback loop’s parameters are tuned automatically to suppress synchrony. Though the study is motivated by neuroscience, the results are relevant to controlling oscillatory activity in ensembles of various natures and, thus, to the rapidly developing field of network physiology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185143097&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2024.1358146; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38371453; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnetp.2024.1358146/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2024.1358146; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/network-physiology/articles/10.3389/fnetp.2024.1358146/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know