Clinical diagnostic biomarker “circulating tumor cells” in breast cancer - a meta-analysis
Frontiers in Oncology, ISSN: 2234-943X, Vol: 13, Page: 1137519
2023
- 6Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Captures5
- Readers5
Review Description
Objective: Using meta-analysis, we evaluate circulating tumor cells(CTCs) as a potential diagnostic tool for breast cancer. Methods: A document search was conducted using publicly available databases up to May 2021. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated and summarize relevant data through literature types, research types, case populations, samples, etc. Subgroup analysis of documents based on regions, enrichment methods, and detection methods. The included research projects were evaluated using DeeKs’ bias, and evaluation indicators such as specificity (SPE), sensitivity (SEN), diagnosis odds ratio (DOR) were used as evaluation indicators. Results: 16 studies on the use of circulating tumor cells to diagnose breast cancer were included in our meta-analysis. Overall sensitivity value was 0.50 (95%CI:0.48-0.52), specificity value was 0.93 (95%CI:0.92- 0.95), DOR value was 33.41 (95%CI:12.47-89.51), and AUC value was 0.8129. Conclusion: In meta-regressions and subgroup analysis, potential heterogeneity factors were analyzed, but the source of heterogeneity is still unclear. CTCs, as a novel tumor marker, have a good diagnostic value, but its enrichment and detection methods still need to continue to be developed to improve detection accuracy. Therefore, CTCs can be used as an auxiliary means of early detection, which is helpful to the diagnosis and screening of breast cancer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164434876&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137519; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397397; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137519/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137519; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1137519/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know