How we diagnose Myelodysplastic syndromes
Frontiers in Oncology, ISSN: 2234-943X, Vol: 14, Page: 1415101
2024
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
The Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal bone marrow (BM) stem cell myeloid neoplasms, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis that results in dysplasia in hematopoietic cells and peripheral cytopenias, especially anemia, and a propensity to leukemic transformation. The suspicion of MDS is raised by a typical but not specific clinical picture and routine laboratory findings, but the gold standard for MDS diagnosis is still BM examination with the presence of uni-or multi-lineage dysplasia and increased blast percentage, together with exclusion of other reasons. Cytogenetics is also an essential part of the diagnostic and prognostic processes. Flow cytometry and full genetic characterization are helpful but not mandatory for MDS diagnosis. This review summarizes the current steps of diagnostic approach for a patient suspected of having MDS. We also express our hopes that within the near future, non-invasive technologies, especially digital and peripheral blood genetics, will mature and be introduced into practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85204940348&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1415101; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39346739; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1415101/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1415101; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1415101/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know