Comparative genomic analysis and phylogeny of NAC25 gene from cultivated and wild Coffea species
Frontiers in Plant Science, ISSN: 1664-462X, Vol: 13, Page: 1009733
2022
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Coffee is a high value agricultural commodity grown in about 80 countries. Sustainable coffee cultivation is hampered by multiple biotic and abiotic stress conditions predominantly driven by climate change. The NAC proteins are plants specific transcription factors associated with various physiological functions in plants which include cell division, secondary wall formation, formation of shoot apical meristem, leaf senescence, flowering embryo and seed development. Besides, they are also involved in biotic and abiotic stress regulation. Due to their ubiquitous influence, studies on NAC transcription factors have gained momentum in different crop plant species. In the present study, NAC25 like transcription factor was isolated and characterized from two cultivated coffee species, Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora and five Indian wild coffee species for the first time. The full-length NAC25 gene varied from 2,456 bp in Coffea jenkinsii to 2,493 bp in C. arabica. In all the seven coffee species, sequencing of the NAC25 gene revealed 3 exons and 2 introns. The NAC25 gene is characterized by a highly conserved 377 bp NAM domain (N-terminus) and a highly variable C terminus region. The sequence analysis revealed an average of one SNP per every 40.92 bp in the coding region and 37.7 bp in the intronic region. Further, the non-synonymous SNPs are 8-11 fold higher compared to synonymous SNPs in the non-coding and coding region of the NAC25 gene, respectively. The expression of NAC25 gene was studied in six different tissue types in C. canephora and higher expression levels were observed in leaf and flower tissues. Further, the relative expression of NAC25 in comparison with the GAPDH gene revealed four folds and eight folds increase in expression levels in green fruit and ripen fruit, respectively. The evolutionary relationship revealed the independent evolution of the NAC25 gene in coffee.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139200041&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1009733; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36186041; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1009733/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1009733; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1009733/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know