Augmented Go/No-Go task: Mouse cursor motion measures improve ADHD symptom assessment in healthy college students
Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN: 1664-1078, Vol: 9, Issue: APR, Page: 496
2018
- 16Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef13
- Captures80
- Readers80
- 80
Article Description
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is frequently characterized as a disorder of executive function (EF). However, behavioral tests of EF, such as go/No-go tasks, often fail to grasp the deficiency in EF revealed by questionnaire-based measures. This inability is usually attributed to questionnaires and behavioral tasks assessing different constructs of EFs. We propose an additional explanation for this discrepancy. We hypothesize that this problem stems from the lack of dynamic assessment of decision-making (e.g., continuous monitoring of motor behavior such as velocity and acceleration in choice reaching) in classical versions of behavioral tasks. We test this hypothesis by introducing dynamic assessment in the form of mouse motion in a go/No-go task. Our results indicate that, among healthy college students, self-report measures of ADHD symptoms become strongly associated with performance in behavioral tasks when continuous assessment (e.g., acceleration in the mouse-cursor motion) is introduced.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045299988&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695985; http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496/supplementary-material/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496.s001; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496.s001; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00496.s001
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know