Measuring mentalizing in youth: further validation of the reflective functioning questionnaire for youth (RFQY-13)
Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN: 1664-1078, Vol: 14, Page: 1260281
2023
- 2Citations
- 11Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Validation of the Three-Factor Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youth in a Chinese Adolescent Sample
Introduction Mentalizing, also known as reflective functioning (RF), is defined as the ability to understand the mental states in self and others, encompassing emotions, intentions,
Article Description
Objective: This study investigated the psychometric properties, including the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the 13-item Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youth (RFQY-13), using a new scoring system. Method: A community sample of 414 adolescents and a clinical sample of 83 adolescents (aged 12–21) completed the RFQY, the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C), the Beck Youth Inventories (BYI), the Child Behavior Checklist-Youth Self Report (CBCL-YSR) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). Results: Using the new scoring system, our results demonstrated configural and metric invariance, as well as adequate reliability and validity across both samples for the two-factor structure of the RFQY. The Uncertainty subscale also showed strong associations with psychopathology. Discussion: The findings show that the RFQY-13, when used with the new coding system, has good psychometric properties and is a reliable measure of mentalizing for adolescents and young adults. We discuss clinical implications, limitations and future directions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85175372424&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260281; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37908815; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260281/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260281; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260281/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know