Preliminary Efficacy Report and Prognosis Analysis of Endoscopic Endonasal Nasopharyngectomy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Frontiers in Surgery, ISSN: 2296-875X, Vol: 8, Page: 713926
2021
- 14Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Background: Compared with radiotherapy, endoscopic endonasal nasopharyngectomy (EEN) is increasingly used to treat recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) because of its good prognosis and mild complications. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of EEN in the treatment of recurrent NPC and factors affecting prognosis. Methods: This study included all patients who received EEN for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma from April 2016 to April 2020. All operations were performed in Xiangya Hospital Central South University. The patient's 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, disease-free survival (DFS) rate and significant prognostic factors are reported. Results: There were 38 (67.9%) males and 28 (32.1%) females, with a median age of 43 (range, 24–69 years).43 (76.8%) of the patients in our study were in advanced rT3-rT4 stage and 32 (74.4%) of the patients in the advanced stage had tumor growth closely related to the internal carotid artery (ICA). During a mean follow up period of 44 month (range 1–65 months) post-surgery. The 2-year OS rate was 48.6%, 2-year DFS rate was 42.6%. The 2-year OS rates of rT1-2 and rT3-4 recurrent NPC were 83.9 and 35.6%, respectively. The 2-year DFS rates of rT1-2 and rT3-4 recurrent NPC 76.2 and 56.3%. The advanced T stage were associated with a poor prognosis in terms of OS and DFS. Conclusions: Data indicate that T staging may be an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. Through proper preoperative evaluation, EEN is an alternative treatment option for advanced recurrent NPC that ensures a certain level of efficacy and is relatively safe with few complications. However, additional studies with long-term follow-up and a larger sample size are required.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114818583&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.713926; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527698; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.713926/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.713926; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2021.713926/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know