Reversal of Azithromycin Resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus by Baicalin
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, ISSN: 2297-1769, Vol: 9, Page: 827674
2022
- 4Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
In recent years, the efficacy of antibiotics has been threatened by the evolution of bacterial resistance. We previously demonstrated that baicalin (Bac) showed synergies with azithromycin (Azm) against Azm-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus (ARSS). The aim of this study was to explore the roles of Bac in reversing the resistance of ARSS to Azm. The ARSS was sequentially passaged for 20 days with the sub-MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of Bac. The strain that recovered sensitivity to Azm was named Azm-sensitive S. saprophyticus (ASSS). The sub-MIC of Bac reversed the resistance of ARSS to Azm. The MIC of Azm against the ASSS strain was 0.488 mg/l, and it was stable within 20 passages. The highest rate of resistance reversal reached 3.09% after ARSS was exposed to 31.25 mg/l Bac for 20 days. Furthermore, semiquantitative biofilm and RT-PCR assays reflected that the ability of biofilm formation and the transcript levels of msrA, mphC, and virulence-associated genes in the ASSS strain were significantly lower than those of the ARSS strain (p < 0.05). Simultaneously, Azm delayed the start time of death, alleviated the injury of the kidney, and decreased the bacterial burden in organs and cytokine levels in mice infected with ASSS. In contrast, Azm did not have a good therapeutic effect on mice infected with ARSS. Therefore, Bac has the potential to be an agent that reversed the resistance of ARSS to Azm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125863509&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.827674; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35252422; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.827674/full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.827674; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.827674/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know