Extensive Discussions of the Eddy Dissipation Concept Constants and Numerical Simulations of the Sandia Flame D
Applied Sciences (Switzerland), ISSN: 2076-3417, Vol: 12, Issue: 18
2022
- 4Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The indisputable wide use of the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) implies that the resulting mean reaction rate is reasonably well modeled. To model turbulent combustions, an amount of EDC constants that differ from the original values was proposed. However, most of them were used without following the nature of the model or considering the effects of the modification. Starting with the energy cascade and the EDC models, the exact original primary and secondary constants are deduced in detail in this work. The mean reaction rate is then formulated from the primary constants or the secondary constants. Based on the physical meaning of fine structures, the limits of the EDC constants are presented and can be used to direct the EDC constant modifications. The effects of the secondary constant on the mean reaction rate are presented and the limiting turbulence Reynolds number used for the validity of EDC is discussed. To show the effects of the constants of the EDC model on the mean reaction rate, 20 combinations of the primary constants are used to simulate a laboratory-scale turbulent jet flame, i.e., Sandia Flame D. After a thorough and careful comparison with experiments, case 8, with a secondary constant of 6 and primary constants of 0.1357 and 0.11, can aptly reproduce this flame, except for in the over-predicted mean OH mass fraction.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know