PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Dual-Process Theory of Thought and Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis

Brain Sciences, ISSN: 2076-3425, Vol: 14, Issue: 1
2024
  • 1
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 11
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 21
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    1
  • Captures
    11
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1
  • Social Media
    21
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      21
      • Facebook
        21

Most Recent News

New Brain Sciences Data Has Been Reported by a Researcher at University of Florence (Dual-Process Theory of Thought and Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis)

2024 FEB 01 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Life Science Daily -- Investigators publish new report on brain sciences. According

Review Description

The dual-process theory of thought rests on the co-existence of two different thinking modalities: a quick, automatic, and associative process opposed to a slow, thoughtful, and deliberative process. The increasing interest in determining the neural foundation of the dual-process distinction has yielded mixed results, also given the difficulty of applying the fMRI standard approach to tasks usually employed in the cognitive literature. We report an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to investigate the neural foundation of the dual-process theory of thought. Eligible studies allowed for the identification of cerebral areas associated with dual-process theory-based tasks without differentiating between fast and slow thinking. The ALE algorithm converged on the medial frontal cortex, superior frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and left inferior frontal gyrus. These structures partially overlap with the cerebral areas recurrently reported in the literature about the neural basis of the dual-process distinction, where the PARCS theory-based interpretation emphasizes the role of the right inferior gyrus. The results confirm the potential (but still almost unexplored) common ground between the dual-process literature and the cognitive control literature.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know