Predicting California Bearing Ratio of Lateritic Soils Using Hybrid Machine Learning Technique
Buildings, ISSN: 2075-5309, Vol: 13, Issue: 1
2023
- 14Citations
- 56Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Buildings, Vol. 13, Pages 255: Predicting California Bearing Ratio of Lateritic Soils Using Hybrid Machine Learning Technique
Buildings, Vol. 13, Pages 255: Predicting California Bearing Ratio of Lateritic Soils Using Hybrid Machine Learning Technique Buildings doi: 10.3390/buildings13010255 Authors: T. Vamsi Nagaraju Alireza
Most Recent News
Study Data from Bhimavaram Update Understanding of Machine Learning (Predicting California Bearing Ratio of Lateritic Soils Using Hybrid Machine Learning Technique)
2023 FEB 03 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News -- Research findings on artificial
Article Description
The increase in population has made it possible for better, more cost-effective vehicular services, which warrants good roadways. The sub-base that serves as a stress-transmitting media and distributes vehicle weight to resist shear and radial deformation is a critical component of the pavement structures. Developing novel techniques that can assess the sub-base soil’s geotechnical characteristics and performance is an urgent need. Laterite soil abundantly available in the West Godavari area of India was employed for this research. Roads and highways construction takes a chunk of geotechnical investigation, particularly, California bearing ratio (CBR) of subgrade soils. Therefore, there is a need for intelligent tool to predict or analyze the CBR value without time-consuming and cumbersome laboratory tests. An integrated extreme learning machine-cooperation search optimizer (ELM-CSO) approach is used herein to predict the CBR values. The correlation coefficient is utilized as cost functions of the CSO to identify the optimal activation weights of the ELM. The statistical measures are separately considered, and best solutions are reported in this article. Comparisons are provided with the standard ELM to show the superiorities of the proposed integrated approach to predict the CBR values. Further, the impact of each input variable is studied separately, and reduced models are proposed with limited and inadequate input data without loss of prediction accuracy. When 70% training and 30% testing data are applied, the ELM-CSO outperforms the CSO with Pearson correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (R), and root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.98, 0.97, and 0.84, respectively. Therefore, based on the prediction findings, the newly built ELM-CSO can be considered an alternative method for predicting real-time engineering issues, including the lateritic soil properties.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know