Grade Classification of Tumors from Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Deep Learning Technique
Diagnostics, ISSN: 2075-4418, Vol: 13, Issue: 6
2023
- 25Citations
- 39Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Study Findings on Diagnostics Described by a Researcher at Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology (Grade Classification of Tumors from Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Deep Learning Technique)
2023 MAR 30 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Health & Medicine Daily -- New research on diagnostics is the subject of
Article Description
To improve the accuracy of tumor identification, it is necessary to develop a reliable automated diagnostic method. In order to precisely categorize brain tumors, researchers developed a variety of segmentation algorithms. Segmentation of brain images is generally recognized as one of the most challenging tasks in medical image processing. In this article, a novel automated detection and classification method was proposed. The proposed approach consisted of many phases, including pre-processing MRI images, segmenting images, extracting features, and classifying images. During the pre-processing portion of an MRI scan, an adaptive filter was utilized to eliminate background noise. For feature extraction, the local-binary grey level co-occurrence matrix (LBGLCM) was used, and for image segmentation, enhanced fuzzy c-means clustering (EFCMC) was used. After extracting the scan features, we used a deep learning model to classify MRI images into two groups: glioma and normal. The classifications were created using a convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN). The proposed technique improved brain image classification from a defined input dataset. MRI scans from the REMBRANDT dataset, which consisted of 620 testing and 2480 training sets, were used for the research. The data demonstrate that the newly proposed method outperformed its predecessors. The proposed CRNN strategy was compared against BP, U-Net, and ResNet, which are three of the most prevalent classification approaches currently being used. For brain tumor classification, the proposed system outcomes were 98.17% accuracy, 91.34% specificity, and 98.79% sensitivity.
Bibliographic Details
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know