Research Progress on Nano-Confinement Effects in Unconventional Oil and Gas Energy—With a Major Focus on Shale Reservoirs
Energies, ISSN: 1996-1073, Vol: 18, Issue: 1
2025
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Review Description
Compared to conventional reservoirs, the abundant nanopores developed in unconventional oil and gas reservoirs influence fluid properties, with nano-confinement effects. The phase behavior, flow characteristics, and solid–liquid interactions of fluids are different from those in conventional reservoirs. This review investigates the physical experiments, numerical simulations, and theoretical calculation methods used in the study of nano-confinement effects in unconventional oil and gas energy. The impact of different methods used in the analysis of fluid phase behavior and movement in nanopores is analyzed. Nanofluidic, Monte Carlo method, and modified equation of state are commonly used to study changes in fluid phase behavior. Nano-confinement effects become significant when pore sizes are below 10 nm, generally leading to a reduction in the fluid’s critical parameters. The molecular dynamic simulation, Monte Carlo, and lattice Boltzmann methods are commonly used to study fluid movement. The diffusion rate of fluids decreases as nanopore confinement increases, and the permeability of nanoscale pores is not only an inherent property of the rock but is also influenced by pressure and fluid–solid interactions. In the future, it will be essential to combine various research methods, achieve progress in small-scale experimental analysis and multiscale simulation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know